| Notable Features |  
        
          |   |  
        
            | 
          Non
            traditional design |  
        
            | 
          Experimental
            approach |  
        
            | 
          Use of
            thin reinforced concrete |  
        
            | 
          Use of
            standardized metal panels |  
        
            | 
          Aluminium
            cladding |  
        
            | 
          Reuse
            and recycling potential |  
        
            | 
          Waste
            minimization |  
         
        
      
 
        
        
          | Basic 
            Information |  
        
          |   |  
        
            | 
          Location:
            Nimes, France |  
        
            | 
          Structure
            : Thin reinforced concrete with aluminium cladding |  
        
            | 
          Building Type: 4-Storey Low-rise Social Housing Scheme |  
        
            | 
          Completion:
            1985-1987 |  
        
            | 
          Total
            Floor Area: 10,300 m2  |  
        
            | 
          Architect: Jean
            Nouvel |  
         
        
      
 
        
        
          | Overview |  
        
          |   |  
        
          | 
             This social
            housing scheme is experimental in nature located in Nimes, France.
            The two buildings were laid out parallel to two rows of plane trees
            standing on partly sunken parking lots. There are 114 units of three
            kinds – simplex, duplex, and triplex – resulting in 17 types of
            units.  |  
        
          | 
             
           |  
        
          | 
              
          
  |  
        
          | 
             Site Layout
            Plan 
           |  
        
          | 
             
           |  
        
          | 
              
             
           |  
        
          
            
              
                | 
                  
                 | 
               
              
                |   | 
               
              
                | 
                   The
                  designer’s intention was "to depart from the general
                  character of past public housing." The buildings of this
                  social housing scheme is informed by various principles such
                  as abundance of space as the main criteria; a wide variety of
                  plans on offer with single levels, split levels, and
                  tri-levels; minimizing of covered collective areas;
                  distribution by external stairs and landings on the north
                  facades; spacious terrace-balconies on the south facades;
                  simple construction in thin concrete with aluminium cladding.  | 
               
              
                |   | 
               
              
                | 
                    
  | 
               
              
                | 
                   View
                  from the East, departure from the safe character  | 
               
              
                |   | 
               
              
                | 
                    
  | 
               
              
                | 
                   Duplex
                  Unit and Single Unit 
                  Plans and Sections.  | 
               
              
                |   | 
               
              
                | 
                     
                 | 
               
              
                | 
                   External
                  Staircases on the north - avoiding strong south sun.
                  | 
               
              
                | 
                   
                 | 
               
              
                | 
                    
                
  | 
               
              
                | 
                   Metal
                  Cladding on as major material.
                  | 
               
              
                | 
                   
                 | 
               
              
                | 
                   The
                  climate also suggests maximum opening to the exterior, the
                  designers included long terrace balconies, and garage-type
                  doors opening the full facade width of apartments so as to
                  extend the living area to the outside.
                  | 
               
              
                | 
                   
                 | 
               
              
                | 
                     
                   
                 | 
               
             
           |   
     | 
      | 
    ![]()  | 
      | 
    
      
        
        
          | Standardization | 
         
        
          |   | 
         
        
                | 
                   The struggle of introducing varieties
                  into standardized projects always stays with housing projects.
                  In this case, open layout and semi-transparent partition,
                  borrowed from office design, as well as multi-level strategy
                  provide the basis of variety. What is valuable in this social
                  housing scheme is its experimental nature which offers a much
                  higher degree of flexibility and the use of non-traditional
                  design elements which normally are difficult to be
                  accepted.   | 
         
        
          |   | 
         
        
          | 
              
  | 
         
        
          |   | 
         
        
                | 
                   Elements
                  of Open Layout and partitioning borrowed from office design  | 
         
        
          | 
                | 
         
        
          | 
             The metal-clad
            caterpillar like structures, called Nemausus1, is a radical departure
            from the existing local stock of stucco and terra-cotta-tile
            low-income housing. The justification is on the identified target
            audiences whom were later reported as tenants under 40 with some
            sort of "artistic inclination". Such a departure from the
            norms is therefore accepted by the market, i.e. the target audience.
            This built example might offer only little insights into the issue
            of C & D waste, but the importance of such lies on its
            experimental nature that prompt to new visions in the local
            construction industry. To introduce this kind of
            "experiment" and variety into public housing, perhaps what
            needs to be formally justified is the question of equality and
            homogeneity that was emphasized previously. 
           | 
         
        
          | 
               
          
  | 
         
        
          | Reuse and
            Recycling | 
         
        
          | 
             
           | 
         
        
          | 
             The
            use of standardized metal panels as finishing material allows
            replacement of individual panels or elements whenever necessary. The
            replaced metal panel on the other hand is able to be recycled
            without generating any significant amount of demolition waste. When
            the building is to be demolished one day, all the metal cladding can
            also be recycled or reused else where. Although the appropriateness
            of using metal cladding in Hong Kong context is arguable perhaps for
            its industrial appearance, ease of abuse and so on, the idea of
            replaceable and recyclable finishing cladding is certainly a
            plausible one in terms of minimizing demolition waste and ultimate
            material recycling.
            | 
         
        
          | 
             
           | 
         
        
          | 
               
          
  | 
         
        
          | 
            Conclusion
           | 
         
        
          | 
             
           | 
         
        
          | 
             Although the
            Architect admits that Nemasus 1’s industrial aesthetic and
            loft-style interiors do not hold universal appeal, pleasing all
            potential occupants was not a criterion of the project. Innovation
            is certainly a plausible word. In order to facilitate innovative
            approach, it is encourage experimentation rather than situating
            oneself onto a safe position of pleasing all potential occupants.
            Without the attempt of experimentation, there is little chance of
            generating innovative ideas particularly within a context of extreme
            constraints.
            | 
         
        
          |   | 
         
        
          | 
               
           | 
         
        
          | 
             Structural
            Details  | 
         
        
          | 
               
           | 
         
        
          | 
            Reference
           | 
         
        
          |   | 
         
        
          | 
             Levene, Richard
            C., Fernando Marquez Cecilia ed. "Nemausus Experimental
            Scheme." Jean Nouvel 1987-94. El Croquis 65/66 (Oct 1994): 94
            -111.  
             
            Stein, Karen D. "Esprit Nouvel: Three Projects, Nimes,
            France" Architectural Record 176 (Jun 1988): 128-35.  
             
            "Nemausus 1, Nimes, France" GA Houses 23 (Aug 1988):
            50-59.  | 
         
        
          |   | 
         
        
          | 
             All images are
            cited from El Croquis 65/66.
            | 
         
        
          | 
               
           | 
         
         
     |